This file has some information on how to get access to the latest PDL sources (mainly of interest for potential developers). This should not be confused with the latest public release which will always be available from CPAN (if you don't know what that is check the FAQ). Public CVS repository at www.sourceforge.org -------------------------------------------- From version PDL-2.003 onwards the source distribution is in a publicly accessible CVS repository. The project is hosted at the sourceforge site at http://sourceforge.net/projects/pdl/ Starting from that URL you will find directions on how to check out the current sources, browse the CVS repository online, etc. If you would like to actively contribute to PDL development don't hesitate to contact one of the project admins (listed at the above URL) to apply for write access to the repository. We strongly believe in the power of open source development! If you do not know how to use CVS try 'man cvs' or 'info cvs' and/or have a look at some of the online tutorials available on the web. The main CVS home page is at http://www.nongnu.org/cvs/ and a very good/complete CVS reference is the online version of the CVS book at http://cvsbook.red-bean.com/cvsbook.html PDL Developer Guidelines: ------------------------- The following guidelines are for any developer that has access to the PDL CVS repository. 1) Before committing a change to the repository you should update: - CHANGES file with a description of the change made. - MANIFEST (using 'make manifest'), MANIFEST.SKIP, TODO files if applicable. 2) Remember to include POD documentation for any functions you add to the distribution. - See Basic/Core/Core.pm for an example of including POD documentation in .pm files. - See Basic/Core/Primitive/Primitive.pd for an example of including POD documentation in PDL .pd files. - read the documentation in PDL::Doc for a detailed description of the PDL documentation conventions. 2) Make sure you add a test case in the 't' directory for any significant additional capability you add to the PDL package. Please use one the of the Test modules available within Perl rather than doing-it-yourself as many of our tests do! The recommended testing module is Test::More which now distributed with the perl distribution. 3) Don't commit before you successfully built and passed 'make test'. But then again, don't keep your changes private for too long to avoid conflicts with other developers. 4) Bugs reported on the list should be entered into the bug database and bugs closed when a patch has been committed as a fix. (Primary responsibility for this task is the pumpking, but other devels should be able to help.) PDL Developer Notes: -------------------- A (small) collection of random musings to note if you feel the need to improve or add to PDL (please do): *) Need help? See the pdl-porters email list; details for subscription and access to the archives can be found on the PDL web page at: http://pdl.perl.org/maillists/index_en.html (English) http://pdl.perl.org/maillists/index_de.html (German) *) Access to PDL's configuration If you need to access the configuration for PDL then use the %PDL::Config variable. Prior to 2.4.1 this was a mess since you had to use %PDL_CONFIG within Makefile.PL and PDL::Config from *.pm/tests. The build process has been changed (I hesitate to say "cleaned up" ;) to just use %PDL::Config consistently throughout. - %PDL::Config is automatically available to you when you are in a Makefile.PL within the PDL distribution. You can change the hash and these changes will be stored in the PDL::Config module. You should only change values when it makes sense (e.g. if the user has specified that a module should be built but you find out this is not possible). - otherwise you can say 'use PDL::Config;' or - perhaps something like eval 'require "' . whereami_any() . '/Core/Config.pm";'; where whereami_any() is from PDL::Core::Dev; *) Location of temporary files Please use $PDL::Config{TEMPDIR} for the directory in which to place temporary files (e.g. when IO::File::new_tmpfile() is not appropriate). This will make it easier for distributions to package PDL since there will only be one place they need to change if the default value causes problems. This *includes* test cases as well as for Makefile.PL's! Creating a new CVS branch: -------------------------- (or how to avoid ridiculous branch names like 'badval_experimental_branchpoint') This is a first draft, so it may not entirely be correct, and I've missed out the initial options you'd supply to cvs (or put in an env variable). 0) see what the current set of tags is: > cvs status -v Changes The important part of the output looks like: Existing Tags: badval_experimental_branchpoint (branch: 1.76.2) trid_experimental2 (branch: 1.69.2) trid_branchpoint2 (revision: 1.69) etc The badval_experimental branch wasn't created using the following rules - I didn't do step 1, so ended up with a branch name called 'badval_experimental_branchpoint' when I meant it to be 'badval_experimental'. 1) tag the current CVS with a label to indicate the state of PDL before the branch: > cvs tag make-cup-of-tea_experimental_branchpoint (this is the step I didn't do above) 2) create a branchpoint > cvs tag -b make_cup_of_tea_experimental 3) you can then either check out a new version, using this branch > cvs co -d PDL.tea -r make-cup-of-tea_experimental PDL this creates a directory PDL.tea/ and stores the files there, or convert a current version > cvs update -r make-cup-of-tea_experimental 4) Make changes to this branch as normal (CVS knows that you are in a branch, so 'cvs update' will now only merge in updates made to this branch.). 5) When it comes time to merge your changes back into the main branch, check out a copy of PDL and merge in the updates: > cvs co -d PDL.merged PDL > cd PDL.merged > cvs update -j make-cup-of-tea_experimental If you are lucky (or you manually went along and merged in the main-branch updates to your branch as they were made) then you do not have to do anything else. In this case the output when the merges are made will look something like: RCS file: /cvsroot/pdl/PDL/t/misc.t,v retrieving revision 1.12 retrieving revision 1.12.2.1 Merging differences between 1.12 and 1.12.2.1 into misc.t However, in the real world you are likely to find out that there are conflicts in the merge, in which case you will see something like: RCS file: /cvsroot/pdl/PDL/Makefile.PL,v retrieving revision 1.44 retrieving revision 1.44.2.1 Merging differences between 1.44 and 1.44.2.1 into Makefile.PL rcsmerge: warning: conflicts during merge The file in question will then contain text within "<<<<<" and ">>>>>" markers (I forget how many of them there are), separated by a line of "=====" which indicate the conflicting parts of the file. The main-branch version of the file is stored as .# for easy comparison (or you could do a 'cvs diff'). These differences should be resolved and then the changes commited to the main branch [CVS will either not allow you to merge - or will complain about it, depending on the version - if there are any of these lines left in the text]. > cvs commit -m "Merged in make-cup-of-tea branch" > cvs tag make-cup-of-tea_experimental_merge1 The reason for tagging the main branch after the merge is to make it easier to merge back any new changes made to the branch (if they occur). The CVS manual contains more details on this. ------------------------------------------------------------- Notes on transferring an external PDL module to the PDL source tree for distribution with PDL. ------------------------------------------------------------- Suppose you have developed a PDL module that resides in a standalone source tree. You typically will need to have PDL installed on your system before you can build this module. If you wish to migrate the module into the PDL distribution you will need to make certain changes to the module source in order to built in the PDL distribution. You will need to removed dependecies on a pre-existing PDL installation for configuration and build of your module. This is because as part of the PDL distribution, it is possible that PDL has never been installed. Build processes based on PDL will then fail. Following is some specific advice that can help you do this. [ These notes are very preliminary and are expected to be ] [ revised and/or replaced by improved documentation. ] Changes that must be made to files in your module source tree if you are building the module from a .pd file : Makefile.PL: -- You must remove the line 'use PDL::Core::Dev;'. -- The line 'PDL::Core::Dev->import();' must be present -- You must change the call from 'pdlpp_postamble' to a call to 'pdlpp_postamble_int' (with the same arguments.) -- It seems that most modules in the PDL source use VERSION_FROM => '../../Basic/Core/Version.pm', but not all of them in order that their version tracks the PDL release version. It is possible to maintain separate versioning even within the PDL source tree but it may make things confusing. Make certain that you make these changes to each 'Makefile.PL' in your source tree. Changes to the existing PDL source tree: -- Edit the 'Makefile.PL' in the directory above your module source to add your module directory name to 'DIR => [ qw/Module1 AnotherModule / ]'. -- Add your test files (.t files) to the PDL/t directory renaming if required to avoid namespace conflicts. -- Does your module depend on any libraries or external programs ? If so, doocument the required programs with version numbers in PDL/DEPENDENCIES and add the PREREQ_* option to the main Makefile.PL if required. -- If your module requires external libraries or header files, add a section to perldl.conf. The hash values with be available in your module's 'Makefile.PL' as $PDL::Config{WITH_MYMODULE},...