(* Title: Pure/proofterm.ML ID: $Id: proofterm.ML,v 1.48 2005/09/19 21:23:51 wenzelm Exp $ Author: Stefan Berghofer, TU Muenchen LF style proof terms. *) infix 8 % %% %>; signature BASIC_PROOFTERM = sig val proofs: int ref datatype proof = PBound of int | Abst of string * typ option * proof | AbsP of string * term option * proof | op % of proof * term option | op %% of proof * proof | Hyp of term | PThm of (string * (string * string list) list) * proof * term * typ list option | PAxm of string * term * typ list option | Oracle of string * term * typ list option | MinProof of ((string * term) * proof) list * (string * term) list * (string * term) list; val %> : proof * term -> proof end; signature PROOFTERM = sig include BASIC_PROOFTERM val infer_derivs : (proof -> proof -> proof) -> bool * proof -> bool * proof -> bool * proof val infer_derivs' : (proof -> proof) -> (bool * proof -> bool * proof) (** primitive operations **) val proof_combt : proof * term list -> proof val proof_combt' : proof * term option list -> proof val proof_combP : proof * proof list -> proof val strip_combt : proof -> proof * term option list val strip_combP : proof -> proof * proof list val strip_thm : proof -> proof val map_proof_terms : (term -> term) -> (typ -> typ) -> proof -> proof val fold_proof_terms : (term * 'a -> 'a) -> (typ * 'a -> 'a) -> 'a * proof -> 'a val add_prf_names : string list * proof -> string list val add_prf_tfree_names : string list * proof -> string list val add_prf_tvar_ixns : indexname list * proof -> indexname list val maxidx_of_proof : proof -> int val size_of_proof : proof -> int val change_type : typ list option -> proof -> proof val prf_abstract_over : term -> proof -> proof val prf_incr_bv : int -> int -> int -> int -> proof -> proof val incr_pboundvars : int -> int -> proof -> proof val prf_loose_bvar1 : proof -> int -> bool val prf_loose_Pbvar1 : proof -> int -> bool val prf_add_loose_bnos : int -> int -> proof -> int list * int list -> int list * int list val norm_proof : Envir.env -> proof -> proof val norm_proof' : Envir.env -> proof -> proof val prf_subst_bounds : term list -> proof -> proof val prf_subst_pbounds : proof list -> proof -> proof val freeze_thaw_prf : proof -> proof * (proof -> proof) val proof_of_min_axm : string * term -> proof val proof_of_min_thm : (string * term) * proof -> proof val thms_of_proof : proof -> (term * proof) list Symtab.table -> (term * proof) list Symtab.table val axms_of_proof : proof -> proof Symtab.table -> proof Symtab.table val oracles_of_proof : (string * term) list -> proof -> (string * term) list (** proof terms for specific inference rules **) val implies_intr_proof : term -> proof -> proof val forall_intr_proof : term -> string -> proof -> proof val varify_proof : term -> (string * sort) list -> proof -> proof val freezeT : term -> proof -> proof val rotate_proof : term list -> term -> int -> proof -> proof val permute_prems_prf : term list -> int -> int -> proof -> proof val instantiate : ((indexname * sort) * typ) list * ((indexname * typ) * term) list -> proof -> proof val lift_proof : term -> int -> term -> proof -> proof val assumption_proof : term list -> term -> int -> proof -> proof val bicompose_proof : term list -> term list -> term list -> term option -> int -> proof -> proof -> proof val equality_axms : (string * term) list val reflexive_axm : proof val symmetric_axm : proof val transitive_axm : proof val equal_intr_axm : proof val equal_elim_axm : proof val abstract_rule_axm : proof val combination_axm : proof val reflexive : proof val symmetric : proof -> proof val transitive : term -> typ -> proof -> proof -> proof val abstract_rule : term -> string -> proof -> proof val combination : term -> term -> term -> term -> typ -> proof -> proof -> proof val equal_intr : term -> term -> proof -> proof -> proof val equal_elim : term -> term -> proof -> proof -> proof val axm_proof : string -> term -> proof val oracle_proof : string -> term -> proof val thm_proof : theory -> string * (string * string list) list -> term list -> term -> proof -> proof val get_name_tags : term list -> term -> proof -> string * (string * string list) list (** rewriting on proof terms **) val add_prf_rrules : (proof * proof) list -> theory -> theory val add_prf_rprocs : (string * (Term.typ list -> proof -> proof option)) list -> theory -> theory val rewrite_proof : theory -> (proof * proof) list * (string * (typ list -> proof -> proof option)) list -> proof -> proof val rewrite_proof_notypes : (proof * proof) list * (string * (typ list -> proof -> proof option)) list -> proof -> proof val init_data: theory -> theory end structure Proofterm : PROOFTERM = struct open Envir; datatype proof = PBound of int | Abst of string * typ option * proof | AbsP of string * term option * proof | op % of proof * term option | op %% of proof * proof | Hyp of term | PThm of (string * (string * string list) list) * proof * term * typ list option | PAxm of string * term * typ list option | Oracle of string * term * typ list option | MinProof of ((string * term) * proof) list * (string * term) list * (string * term) list; fun proof_of_min_axm (s, prop) = PAxm (s, prop, NONE); fun proof_of_min_thm ((s, prop), prf) = PThm ((s, []), prf, prop, NONE); val string_term_ord = prod_ord fast_string_ord Term.fast_term_ord; fun oracles_of_proof oras prf = let fun oras_of (Abst (_, _, prf)) = oras_of prf | oras_of (AbsP (_, _, prf)) = oras_of prf | oras_of (prf % _) = oras_of prf | oras_of (prf1 %% prf2) = oras_of prf1 #> oras_of prf2 | oras_of (PThm ((name, _), prf, prop, _)) = (fn tabs as (thms, oras) => case Symtab.lookup thms name of NONE => oras_of prf (Symtab.update (name, [prop]) thms, oras) | SOME ps => if member (op =) ps prop then tabs else oras_of prf (Symtab.update (name, prop::ps) thms, oras)) | oras_of (Oracle (s, prop, _)) = apsnd (OrdList.insert string_term_ord (s, prop)) | oras_of (MinProof (thms, _, oras)) = apsnd (OrdList.union string_term_ord oras) #> fold (oras_of o proof_of_min_thm) thms | oras_of _ = I in snd (oras_of prf (Symtab.empty, oras)) end; fun thms_of_proof (Abst (_, _, prf)) = thms_of_proof prf | thms_of_proof (AbsP (_, _, prf)) = thms_of_proof prf | thms_of_proof (prf1 %% prf2) = thms_of_proof prf1 #> thms_of_proof prf2 | thms_of_proof (prf % _) = thms_of_proof prf | thms_of_proof (prf' as PThm ((s, _), prf, prop, _)) = (fn tab => case Symtab.lookup tab s of NONE => thms_of_proof prf (Symtab.update (s, [(prop, prf')]) tab) | SOME ps => if exists (equal prop o fst) ps then tab else thms_of_proof prf (Symtab.update (s, (prop, prf')::ps) tab)) | thms_of_proof (MinProof (prfs, _, _)) = fold (thms_of_proof o proof_of_min_thm) prfs | thms_of_proof _ = I; fun axms_of_proof (Abst (_, _, prf)) = axms_of_proof prf | axms_of_proof (AbsP (_, _, prf)) = axms_of_proof prf | axms_of_proof (prf1 %% prf2) = axms_of_proof prf1 #> axms_of_proof prf2 | axms_of_proof (prf % _) = axms_of_proof prf | axms_of_proof (prf as PAxm (s, _, _)) = Symtab.update (s, prf) | axms_of_proof (MinProof (_, prfs, _)) = fold (axms_of_proof o proof_of_min_axm) prfs | axms_of_proof _ = I; (** collect all theorems, axioms and oracles **) fun map3 f g h (thms, axms, oras) = (f thms, g axms, h oras); fun mk_min_proof (Abst (_, _, prf)) = mk_min_proof prf | mk_min_proof (AbsP (_, _, prf)) = mk_min_proof prf | mk_min_proof (prf % _) = mk_min_proof prf | mk_min_proof (prf1 %% prf2) = mk_min_proof prf1 #> mk_min_proof prf2 | mk_min_proof (PThm ((s, _), prf, prop, _)) = map3 (OrdList.insert (string_term_ord o pairself fst) ((s, prop), prf)) I I | mk_min_proof (PAxm (s, prop, _)) = map3 I (OrdList.insert string_term_ord (s, prop)) I | mk_min_proof (Oracle (s, prop, _)) = map3 I I (OrdList.insert string_term_ord (s, prop)) | mk_min_proof (MinProof (thms, axms, oras)) = map3 (OrdList.union (string_term_ord o pairself fst) thms) (OrdList.union string_term_ord axms) (OrdList.union string_term_ord oras) | mk_min_proof _ = I; (** proof objects with different levels of detail **) val proofs = ref 2; fun err_illegal_level i = error ("Illegal level of detail for proof objects: " ^ string_of_int i); fun if_ora b = if b then oracles_of_proof else K; fun infer_derivs f (ora1, prf1) (ora2, prf2) = (ora1 orelse ora2, case !proofs of 2 => f prf1 prf2 | 1 => MinProof (([], [], []) |> mk_min_proof prf1 |> mk_min_proof prf2) | 0 => MinProof ([], [], if_ora ora2 (if_ora ora1 [] prf1) prf2) | i => err_illegal_level i); fun infer_derivs' f = infer_derivs (K f) (false, MinProof ([], [], [])); fun (prf %> t) = prf % SOME t; val proof_combt = Library.foldl (op %>); val proof_combt' = Library.foldl (op %); val proof_combP = Library.foldl (op %%); fun strip_combt prf = let fun stripc (prf % t, ts) = stripc (prf, t::ts) | stripc x = x in stripc (prf, []) end; fun strip_combP prf = let fun stripc (prf %% prf', prfs) = stripc (prf, prf'::prfs) | stripc x = x in stripc (prf, []) end; fun strip_thm prf = (case strip_combt (fst (strip_combP prf)) of (PThm (_, prf', _, _), _) => prf' | _ => prf); val mk_Abst = foldr (fn ((s, T:typ), prf) => Abst (s, NONE, prf)); fun mk_AbsP (i, prf) = funpow i (fn prf => AbsP ("H", NONE, prf)) prf; fun apsome' f NONE = raise SAME | apsome' f (SOME x) = SOME (f x); fun same f x = let val x' = f x in if x = x' then raise SAME else x' end; fun map_proof_terms f g = let fun mapp (Abst (s, T, prf)) = (Abst (s, apsome' (same g) T, mapph prf) handle SAME => Abst (s, T, mapp prf)) | mapp (AbsP (s, t, prf)) = (AbsP (s, apsome' (same f) t, mapph prf) handle SAME => AbsP (s, t, mapp prf)) | mapp (prf % t) = (mapp prf % Option.map f t handle SAME => prf % apsome' (same f) t) | mapp (prf1 %% prf2) = (mapp prf1 %% mapph prf2 handle SAME => prf1 %% mapp prf2) | mapp (PThm (a, prf, prop, SOME Ts)) = PThm (a, prf, prop, SOME (same (map g) Ts)) | mapp (PAxm (a, prop, SOME Ts)) = PAxm (a, prop, SOME (same (map g) Ts)) | mapp _ = raise SAME and mapph prf = (mapp prf handle SAME => prf) in mapph end; fun fold_proof_terms f g (a, Abst (_, SOME T, prf)) = fold_proof_terms f g (g (T, a), prf) | fold_proof_terms f g (a, Abst (_, NONE, prf)) = fold_proof_terms f g (a, prf) | fold_proof_terms f g (a, AbsP (_, SOME t, prf)) = fold_proof_terms f g (f (t, a), prf) | fold_proof_terms f g (a, AbsP (_, NONE, prf)) = fold_proof_terms f g (a, prf) | fold_proof_terms f g (a, prf % SOME t) = f (t, fold_proof_terms f g (a, prf)) | fold_proof_terms f g (a, prf % NONE) = fold_proof_terms f g (a, prf) | fold_proof_terms f g (a, prf1 %% prf2) = fold_proof_terms f g (fold_proof_terms f g (a, prf1), prf2) | fold_proof_terms _ g (a, PThm (_, _, _, SOME Ts)) = foldr g a Ts | fold_proof_terms _ g (a, PAxm (_, prop, SOME Ts)) = foldr g a Ts | fold_proof_terms _ _ (a, _) = a; val add_prf_names = fold_proof_terms add_term_names ((uncurry K) o swap); val add_prf_tfree_names = fold_proof_terms add_term_tfree_names add_typ_tfree_names; val add_prf_tvar_ixns = fold_proof_terms add_term_tvar_ixns (add_typ_ixns o swap); fun maxidx_of_proof prf = fold_proof_terms (Int.max o apfst maxidx_of_term) (Int.max o apfst maxidx_of_typ) (~1, prf); fun size_of_proof (Abst (_, _, prf)) = 1 + size_of_proof prf | size_of_proof (AbsP (_, t, prf)) = 1 + size_of_proof prf | size_of_proof (prf1 %% prf2) = size_of_proof prf1 + size_of_proof prf2 | size_of_proof (prf % _) = 1 + size_of_proof prf | size_of_proof _ = 1; fun change_type opTs (PThm (name, prf, prop, _)) = PThm (name, prf, prop, opTs) | change_type opTs (PAxm (name, prop, _)) = PAxm (name, prop, opTs) | change_type opTs (Oracle (name, prop, _)) = Oracle (name, prop, opTs) | change_type _ prf = prf; (***** utilities *****) fun strip_abs (_::Ts) (Abs (_, _, t)) = strip_abs Ts t | strip_abs _ t = t; fun mk_abs Ts t = Library.foldl (fn (t', T) => Abs ("", T, t')) (t, Ts); (*Abstraction of a proof term over its occurrences of v, which must contain no loose bound variables. The resulting proof term is ready to become the body of an Abst.*) fun prf_abstract_over v = let fun abst' lev u = if v aconv u then Bound lev else (case u of Abs (a, T, t) => Abs (a, T, abst' (lev + 1) t) | f $ t => (abst' lev f $ absth' lev t handle SAME => f $ abst' lev t) | _ => raise SAME) and absth' lev t = (abst' lev t handle SAME => t); fun abst lev (AbsP (a, t, prf)) = (AbsP (a, apsome' (abst' lev) t, absth lev prf) handle SAME => AbsP (a, t, abst lev prf)) | abst lev (Abst (a, T, prf)) = Abst (a, T, abst (lev + 1) prf) | abst lev (prf1 %% prf2) = (abst lev prf1 %% absth lev prf2 handle SAME => prf1 %% abst lev prf2) | abst lev (prf % t) = (abst lev prf % Option.map (absth' lev) t handle SAME => prf % apsome' (abst' lev) t) | abst _ _ = raise SAME and absth lev prf = (abst lev prf handle SAME => prf) in absth 0 end; (*increments a proof term's non-local bound variables required when moving a proof term within abstractions inc is increment for bound variables lev is level at which a bound variable is considered 'loose'*) fun incr_bv' inct tlev t = incr_bv (inct, tlev, t); fun prf_incr_bv' incP inct Plev tlev (PBound i) = if i >= Plev then PBound (i+incP) else raise SAME | prf_incr_bv' incP inct Plev tlev (AbsP (a, t, body)) = (AbsP (a, apsome' (same (incr_bv' inct tlev)) t, prf_incr_bv incP inct (Plev+1) tlev body) handle SAME => AbsP (a, t, prf_incr_bv' incP inct (Plev+1) tlev body)) | prf_incr_bv' incP inct Plev tlev (Abst (a, T, body)) = Abst (a, T, prf_incr_bv' incP inct Plev (tlev+1) body) | prf_incr_bv' incP inct Plev tlev (prf %% prf') = (prf_incr_bv' incP inct Plev tlev prf %% prf_incr_bv incP inct Plev tlev prf' handle SAME => prf %% prf_incr_bv' incP inct Plev tlev prf') | prf_incr_bv' incP inct Plev tlev (prf % t) = (prf_incr_bv' incP inct Plev tlev prf % Option.map (incr_bv' inct tlev) t handle SAME => prf % apsome' (same (incr_bv' inct tlev)) t) | prf_incr_bv' _ _ _ _ _ = raise SAME and prf_incr_bv incP inct Plev tlev prf = (prf_incr_bv' incP inct Plev tlev prf handle SAME => prf); fun incr_pboundvars 0 0 prf = prf | incr_pboundvars incP inct prf = prf_incr_bv incP inct 0 0 prf; fun prf_loose_bvar1 (prf1 %% prf2) k = prf_loose_bvar1 prf1 k orelse prf_loose_bvar1 prf2 k | prf_loose_bvar1 (prf % SOME t) k = prf_loose_bvar1 prf k orelse loose_bvar1 (t, k) | prf_loose_bvar1 (_ % NONE) _ = true | prf_loose_bvar1 (AbsP (_, SOME t, prf)) k = loose_bvar1 (t, k) orelse prf_loose_bvar1 prf k | prf_loose_bvar1 (AbsP (_, NONE, _)) k = true | prf_loose_bvar1 (Abst (_, _, prf)) k = prf_loose_bvar1 prf (k+1) | prf_loose_bvar1 _ _ = false; fun prf_loose_Pbvar1 (PBound i) k = i = k | prf_loose_Pbvar1 (prf1 %% prf2) k = prf_loose_Pbvar1 prf1 k orelse prf_loose_Pbvar1 prf2 k | prf_loose_Pbvar1 (prf % _) k = prf_loose_Pbvar1 prf k | prf_loose_Pbvar1 (AbsP (_, _, prf)) k = prf_loose_Pbvar1 prf (k+1) | prf_loose_Pbvar1 (Abst (_, _, prf)) k = prf_loose_Pbvar1 prf k | prf_loose_Pbvar1 _ _ = false; fun prf_add_loose_bnos plev tlev (PBound i) (is, js) = if i < plev then (is, js) else (insert (op =) (i-plev) is, js) | prf_add_loose_bnos plev tlev (prf1 %% prf2) p = prf_add_loose_bnos plev tlev prf2 (prf_add_loose_bnos plev tlev prf1 p) | prf_add_loose_bnos plev tlev (prf % opt) (is, js) = prf_add_loose_bnos plev tlev prf (case opt of NONE => (is, insert (op =) ~1 js) | SOME t => (is, add_loose_bnos (t, tlev, js))) | prf_add_loose_bnos plev tlev (AbsP (_, opt, prf)) (is, js) = prf_add_loose_bnos (plev+1) tlev prf (case opt of NONE => (is, insert (op =) ~1 js) | SOME t => (is, add_loose_bnos (t, tlev, js))) | prf_add_loose_bnos plev tlev (Abst (_, _, prf)) p = prf_add_loose_bnos plev (tlev+1) prf p | prf_add_loose_bnos _ _ _ _ = ([], []); (**** substitutions ****) fun norm_proof env = let val envT = type_env env; fun norm (Abst (s, T, prf)) = (Abst (s, apsome' (norm_type_same envT) T, normh prf) handle SAME => Abst (s, T, norm prf)) | norm (AbsP (s, t, prf)) = (AbsP (s, apsome' (norm_term_same env) t, normh prf) handle SAME => AbsP (s, t, norm prf)) | norm (prf % t) = (norm prf % Option.map (norm_term env) t handle SAME => prf % apsome' (norm_term_same env) t) | norm (prf1 %% prf2) = (norm prf1 %% normh prf2 handle SAME => prf1 %% norm prf2) | norm (PThm (s, prf, t, Ts)) = PThm (s, prf, t, apsome' (norm_types_same envT) Ts) | norm (PAxm (s, prop, Ts)) = PAxm (s, prop, apsome' (norm_types_same envT) Ts) | norm _ = raise SAME and normh prf = (norm prf handle SAME => prf); in normh end; (***** Remove some types in proof term (to save space) *****) fun remove_types (Abs (s, _, t)) = Abs (s, dummyT, remove_types t) | remove_types (t $ u) = remove_types t $ remove_types u | remove_types (Const (s, _)) = Const (s, dummyT) | remove_types t = t; fun remove_types_env (Envir.Envir {iTs, asol, maxidx}) = Envir.Envir {iTs = iTs, asol = Vartab.map (apsnd remove_types) asol, maxidx = maxidx}; fun norm_proof' env prf = norm_proof (remove_types_env env) prf; (**** substitution of bound variables ****) fun prf_subst_bounds args prf = let val n = length args; fun subst' lev (Bound i) = (if i Bound (i-n) (*loose: change it*)) | subst' lev (Abs (a, T, body)) = Abs (a, T, subst' (lev+1) body) | subst' lev (f $ t) = (subst' lev f $ substh' lev t handle SAME => f $ subst' lev t) | subst' _ _ = raise SAME and substh' lev t = (subst' lev t handle SAME => t); fun subst lev (AbsP (a, t, body)) = (AbsP (a, apsome' (subst' lev) t, substh lev body) handle SAME => AbsP (a, t, subst lev body)) | subst lev (Abst (a, T, body)) = Abst (a, T, subst (lev+1) body) | subst lev (prf %% prf') = (subst lev prf %% substh lev prf' handle SAME => prf %% subst lev prf') | subst lev (prf % t) = (subst lev prf % Option.map (substh' lev) t handle SAME => prf % apsome' (subst' lev) t) | subst _ _ = raise SAME and substh lev prf = (subst lev prf handle SAME => prf) in case args of [] => prf | _ => substh 0 prf end; fun prf_subst_pbounds args prf = let val n = length args; fun subst (PBound i) Plev tlev = (if i < Plev then raise SAME (*var is locally bound*) else incr_pboundvars Plev tlev (List.nth (args, i-Plev)) handle Subscript => PBound (i-n) (*loose: change it*)) | subst (AbsP (a, t, body)) Plev tlev = AbsP (a, t, subst body (Plev+1) tlev) | subst (Abst (a, T, body)) Plev tlev = Abst (a, T, subst body Plev (tlev+1)) | subst (prf %% prf') Plev tlev = (subst prf Plev tlev %% substh prf' Plev tlev handle SAME => prf %% subst prf' Plev tlev) | subst (prf % t) Plev tlev = subst prf Plev tlev % t | subst prf _ _ = raise SAME and substh prf Plev tlev = (subst prf Plev tlev handle SAME => prf) in case args of [] => prf | _ => substh prf 0 0 end; (**** Freezing and thawing of variables in proof terms ****) fun frzT names = map_type_tvar (fn (ixn, xs) => TFree ((the o AList.lookup (op =) names) ixn, xs)); fun thawT names = map_type_tfree (fn (s, xs) => case AList.lookup (op =) names s of NONE => TFree (s, xs) | SOME ixn => TVar (ixn, xs)); fun freeze names names' (t $ u) = freeze names names' t $ freeze names names' u | freeze names names' (Abs (s, T, t)) = Abs (s, frzT names' T, freeze names names' t) | freeze names names' (Const (s, T)) = Const (s, frzT names' T) | freeze names names' (Free (s, T)) = Free (s, frzT names' T) | freeze names names' (Var (ixn, T)) = Free ((the o AList.lookup (op =) names) ixn, frzT names' T) | freeze names names' t = t; fun thaw names names' (t $ u) = thaw names names' t $ thaw names names' u | thaw names names' (Abs (s, T, t)) = Abs (s, thawT names' T, thaw names names' t) | thaw names names' (Const (s, T)) = Const (s, thawT names' T) | thaw names names' (Free (s, T)) = let val T' = thawT names' T in case AList.lookup (op =) names s of NONE => Free (s, T') | SOME ixn => Var (ixn, T') end | thaw names names' (Var (ixn, T)) = Var (ixn, thawT names' T) | thaw names names' t = t; fun freeze_thaw_prf prf = let val (fs, Tfs, vs, Tvs) = fold_proof_terms (fn (t, (fs, Tfs, vs, Tvs)) => (add_term_frees (t, fs), add_term_tfree_names (t, Tfs), add_term_vars (t, vs), add_term_tvar_ixns (t, Tvs))) (fn (T, (fs, Tfs, vs, Tvs)) => (fs, add_typ_tfree_names (T, Tfs), vs, add_typ_ixns (Tvs, T))) (([], [], [], []), prf); val fs' = map (fst o dest_Free) fs; val vs' = map (fst o dest_Var) vs; val names = vs' ~~ variantlist (map fst vs', fs'); val names' = Tvs ~~ variantlist (map fst Tvs, Tfs); val rnames = map swap names; val rnames' = map swap names'; in (map_proof_terms (freeze names names') (frzT names') prf, map_proof_terms (thaw rnames rnames') (thawT rnames')) end; (***** implication introduction *****) fun implies_intr_proof h prf = let fun abshyp i (Hyp t) = if h aconv t then PBound i else raise SAME | abshyp i (Abst (s, T, prf)) = Abst (s, T, abshyp i prf) | abshyp i (AbsP (s, t, prf)) = AbsP (s, t, abshyp (i+1) prf) | abshyp i (prf % t) = abshyp i prf % t | abshyp i (prf1 %% prf2) = (abshyp i prf1 %% abshyph i prf2 handle SAME => prf1 %% abshyp i prf2) | abshyp _ _ = raise SAME and abshyph i prf = (abshyp i prf handle SAME => prf) in AbsP ("H", NONE (*h*), abshyph 0 prf) end; (***** forall introduction *****) fun forall_intr_proof x a prf = Abst (a, NONE, prf_abstract_over x prf); (***** varify *****) fun varify_proof t fixed prf = let val fs = add_term_tfrees (t, []) \\ fixed; val ixns = add_term_tvar_ixns (t, []); val fmap = fs ~~ variantlist (map fst fs, map #1 ixns) fun thaw (f as (a, S)) = (case AList.lookup (op =) fmap f of NONE => TFree f | SOME b => TVar ((b, 0), S)); in map_proof_terms (map_term_types (map_type_tfree thaw)) (map_type_tfree thaw) prf end; local fun new_name (ix, (pairs,used)) = let val v = variant used (string_of_indexname ix) in ((ix, v) :: pairs, v :: used) end; fun freeze_one alist (ix, sort) = (case AList.lookup (op =) alist ix of NONE => TVar (ix, sort) | SOME name => TFree (name, sort)); in fun freezeT t prf = let val used = it_term_types add_typ_tfree_names (t, []) and tvars = map #1 (it_term_types add_typ_tvars (t, [])); val (alist, _) = foldr new_name ([], used) tvars; in (case alist of [] => prf (*nothing to do!*) | _ => let val frzT = map_type_tvar (freeze_one alist) in map_proof_terms (map_term_types frzT) frzT prf end) end; end; (***** rotate assumptions *****) fun rotate_proof Bs Bi m prf = let val params = Term.strip_all_vars Bi; val asms = Logic.strip_imp_prems (Term.strip_all_body Bi); val i = length asms; val j = length Bs; in mk_AbsP (j+1, proof_combP (prf, map PBound (j downto 1) @ [mk_Abst (mk_AbsP (i, proof_combP (proof_combt (PBound i, map Bound ((length params - 1) downto 0)), map PBound (((i-m-1) downto 0) @ ((i-1) downto (i-m)))))) params])) end; (***** permute premises *****) fun permute_prems_prf prems j k prf = let val n = length prems in mk_AbsP (n, proof_combP (prf, map PBound ((n-1 downto n-j) @ (k-1 downto 0) @ (n-j-1 downto k)))) end; (***** instantiation *****) fun instantiate (instT, inst) prf = map_proof_terms (Term.instantiate (instT, map (apsnd remove_types) inst)) (Term.instantiateT instT) prf; (***** lifting *****) fun lift_proof Bi inc prop prf = let val (_, lift_all) = Logic.lift_fns (Bi, inc); fun lift'' Us Ts t = strip_abs Ts (Logic.incr_indexes (Us, inc) (mk_abs Ts t)); fun lift' Us Ts (Abst (s, T, prf)) = (Abst (s, apsome' (same (Logic.incr_tvar inc)) T, lifth' Us (dummyT::Ts) prf) handle SAME => Abst (s, T, lift' Us (dummyT::Ts) prf)) | lift' Us Ts (AbsP (s, t, prf)) = (AbsP (s, apsome' (same (lift'' Us Ts)) t, lifth' Us Ts prf) handle SAME => AbsP (s, t, lift' Us Ts prf)) | lift' Us Ts (prf % t) = (lift' Us Ts prf % Option.map (lift'' Us Ts) t handle SAME => prf % apsome' (same (lift'' Us Ts)) t) | lift' Us Ts (prf1 %% prf2) = (lift' Us Ts prf1 %% lifth' Us Ts prf2 handle SAME => prf1 %% lift' Us Ts prf2) | lift' _ _ (PThm (s, prf, prop, Ts)) = PThm (s, prf, prop, apsome' (same (map (Logic.incr_tvar inc))) Ts) | lift' _ _ (PAxm (s, prop, Ts)) = PAxm (s, prop, apsome' (same (map (Logic.incr_tvar inc))) Ts) | lift' _ _ _ = raise SAME and lifth' Us Ts prf = (lift' Us Ts prf handle SAME => prf); val ps = map lift_all (Logic.strip_imp_prems prop); val k = length ps; fun mk_app (b, (i, j, prf)) = if b then (i-1, j, prf %% PBound i) else (i, j-1, prf %> Bound j); fun lift Us bs i j (Const ("==>", _) $ A $ B) = AbsP ("H", NONE (*A*), lift Us (true::bs) (i+1) j B) | lift Us bs i j (Const ("all", _) $ Abs (a, T, t)) = Abst (a, NONE (*T*), lift (T::Us) (false::bs) i (j+1) t) | lift Us bs i j _ = proof_combP (lifth' (rev Us) [] prf, map (fn k => (#3 (foldr mk_app (i-1, j-1, PBound k) bs))) (i + k - 1 downto i)); in mk_AbsP (k, lift [] [] 0 0 Bi) end; (***** proof by assumption *****) fun mk_asm_prf (Const ("==>", _) $ A $ B) i = AbsP ("H", NONE (*A*), mk_asm_prf B (i+1)) | mk_asm_prf (Const ("all", _) $ Abs (a, T, t)) i = Abst (a, NONE (*T*), mk_asm_prf t i) | mk_asm_prf _ i = PBound i; fun assumption_proof Bs Bi n prf = mk_AbsP (length Bs, proof_combP (prf, map PBound (length Bs - 1 downto 0) @ [mk_asm_prf Bi (~n)])); (***** Composition of object rule with proof state *****) fun flatten_params_proof i j n (Const ("==>", _) $ A $ B, k) = AbsP ("H", NONE (*A*), flatten_params_proof (i+1) j n (B, k)) | flatten_params_proof i j n (Const ("all", _) $ Abs (a, T, t), k) = Abst (a, NONE (*T*), flatten_params_proof i (j+1) n (t, k)) | flatten_params_proof i j n (_, k) = proof_combP (proof_combt (PBound (k+i), map Bound (j-1 downto 0)), map PBound (i-1 downto 0 \ i-n)); fun bicompose_proof Bs oldAs newAs A n rprf sprf = let val la = length newAs; val lb = length Bs; in mk_AbsP (lb+la, proof_combP (sprf, map PBound (lb + la - 1 downto la)) %% proof_combP (rprf, (if n>0 then [mk_asm_prf (valOf A) (~n)] else []) @ map (flatten_params_proof 0 0 n) (oldAs ~~ (la - 1 downto 0)))) end; (***** axioms for equality *****) val aT = TFree ("'a", []); val bT = TFree ("'b", []); val x = Free ("x", aT); val y = Free ("y", aT); val z = Free ("z", aT); val A = Free ("A", propT); val B = Free ("B", propT); val f = Free ("f", aT --> bT); val g = Free ("g", aT --> bT); local open Logic in val equality_axms = [("reflexive", mk_equals (x, x)), ("symmetric", mk_implies (mk_equals (x, y), mk_equals (y, x))), ("transitive", list_implies ([mk_equals (x, y), mk_equals (y, z)], mk_equals (x, z))), ("equal_intr", list_implies ([mk_implies (A, B), mk_implies (B, A)], mk_equals (A, B))), ("equal_elim", list_implies ([mk_equals (A, B), A], B)), ("abstract_rule", Logic.mk_implies (all aT $ Abs ("x", aT, equals bT $ (f $ Bound 0) $ (g $ Bound 0)), equals (aT --> bT) $ Abs ("x", aT, f $ Bound 0) $ Abs ("x", aT, g $ Bound 0))), ("combination", Logic.list_implies ([Logic.mk_equals (f, g), Logic.mk_equals (x, y)], Logic.mk_equals (f $ x, g $ y)))]; val [reflexive_axm, symmetric_axm, transitive_axm, equal_intr_axm, equal_elim_axm, abstract_rule_axm, combination_axm] = map (fn (s, t) => PAxm ("ProtoPure." ^ s, varify t, NONE)) equality_axms; end; val reflexive = reflexive_axm % NONE; fun symmetric (prf as PAxm ("ProtoPure.reflexive", _, _) % _) = prf | symmetric prf = symmetric_axm % NONE % NONE %% prf; fun transitive _ _ (PAxm ("ProtoPure.reflexive", _, _) % _) prf2 = prf2 | transitive _ _ prf1 (PAxm ("ProtoPure.reflexive", _, _) % _) = prf1 | transitive u (Type ("prop", [])) prf1 prf2 = transitive_axm % NONE % SOME (remove_types u) % NONE %% prf1 %% prf2 | transitive u T prf1 prf2 = transitive_axm % NONE % NONE % NONE %% prf1 %% prf2; fun abstract_rule x a prf = abstract_rule_axm % NONE % NONE %% forall_intr_proof x a prf; fun check_comb (PAxm ("ProtoPure.combination", _, _) % f % g % _ % _ %% prf %% _) = isSome f orelse check_comb prf | check_comb (PAxm ("ProtoPure.transitive", _, _) % _ % _ % _ %% prf1 %% prf2) = check_comb prf1 andalso check_comb prf2 | check_comb (PAxm ("ProtoPure.symmetric", _, _) % _ % _ %% prf) = check_comb prf | check_comb _ = false; fun combination f g t u (Type (_, [T, U])) prf1 prf2 = let val f = Envir.beta_norm f; val g = Envir.beta_norm g; val prf = if check_comb prf1 then combination_axm % NONE % NONE else (case prf1 of PAxm ("ProtoPure.reflexive", _, _) % _ => combination_axm %> remove_types f % NONE | _ => combination_axm %> remove_types f %> remove_types g) in (case T of Type ("fun", _) => prf % (case head_of f of Abs _ => SOME (remove_types t) | Var _ => SOME (remove_types t) | _ => NONE) % (case head_of g of Abs _ => SOME (remove_types u) | Var _ => SOME (remove_types u) | _ => NONE) %% prf1 %% prf2 | _ => prf % NONE % NONE %% prf1 %% prf2) end; fun equal_intr A B prf1 prf2 = equal_intr_axm %> remove_types A %> remove_types B %% prf1 %% prf2; fun equal_elim A B prf1 prf2 = equal_elim_axm %> remove_types A %> remove_types B %% prf1 %% prf2; (***** axioms and theorems *****) fun vars_of t = rev (fold_aterms (fn v as Var _ => insert (op =) v | _ => I) t []); fun test_args _ [] = true | test_args is (Bound i :: ts) = not (member (op =) is i) andalso test_args (i :: is) ts | test_args _ _ = false; fun is_fun (Type ("fun", _)) = true | is_fun (TVar _) = true | is_fun _ = false; fun add_funvars Ts (vs, t) = if is_fun (fastype_of1 (Ts, t)) then vs union List.mapPartial (fn Var (ixn, T) => if is_fun T then SOME ixn else NONE | _ => NONE) (vars_of t) else vs; fun add_npvars q p Ts (vs, Const ("==>", _) $ t $ u) = add_npvars q p Ts (add_npvars q (not p) Ts (vs, t), u) | add_npvars q p Ts (vs, Const ("all", Type (_, [Type (_, [T, _]), _])) $ t) = add_npvars q p Ts (vs, if p andalso q then betapply (t, Var (("",0), T)) else t) | add_npvars q p Ts (vs, Abs (_, T, t)) = add_npvars q p (T::Ts) (vs, t) | add_npvars _ _ Ts (vs, t) = add_npvars' Ts (vs, t) and add_npvars' Ts (vs, t) = (case strip_comb t of (Var (ixn, _), ts) => if test_args [] ts then vs else Library.foldl (add_npvars' Ts) (AList.update (op =) (ixn, Library.foldl (add_funvars Ts) ((these ooo AList.lookup) (op =) vs ixn, ts)) vs, ts) | (Abs (_, T, u), ts) => Library.foldl (add_npvars' (T::Ts)) (vs, u :: ts) | (_, ts) => Library.foldl (add_npvars' Ts) (vs, ts)); fun prop_vars (Const ("==>", _) $ P $ Q) = prop_vars P union prop_vars Q | prop_vars (Const ("all", _) $ Abs (_, _, t)) = prop_vars t | prop_vars t = (case strip_comb t of (Var (ixn, _), _) => [ixn] | _ => []); fun is_proj t = let fun is_p i t = (case strip_comb t of (Bound j, []) => false | (Bound j, ts) => j >= i orelse exists (is_p i) ts | (Abs (_, _, u), _) => is_p (i+1) u | (_, ts) => exists (is_p i) ts) in (case strip_abs_body t of Bound _ => true | t' => is_p 0 t') end; fun needed_vars prop = Library.foldl op union ([], map op ins (add_npvars true true [] ([], prop))) union prop_vars prop; fun gen_axm_proof c name prop = let val nvs = needed_vars prop; val args = map (fn (v as Var (ixn, _)) => if member (op =) nvs ixn then SOME v else NONE) (vars_of prop) @ map SOME (sort Term.term_ord (term_frees prop)); in proof_combt' (c (name, prop, NONE), args) end; val axm_proof = gen_axm_proof PAxm; val dummy = Const (Term.dummy_patternN, dummyT); fun oracle_proof name prop = if !proofs = 0 then Oracle (name, dummy, NONE) else gen_axm_proof Oracle name prop; fun shrink_proof thy = let val compress_typ = Compress.typ thy; val compress_term = Compress.term thy; fun shrink ls lev (prf as Abst (a, T, body)) = let val (b, is, ch, body') = shrink ls (lev+1) body in (b, is, ch, if ch then Abst (a, Option.map compress_typ T, body') else prf) end | shrink ls lev (prf as AbsP (a, t, body)) = let val (b, is, ch, body') = shrink (lev::ls) lev body in (b orelse member (op =) is 0, List.mapPartial (fn 0 => NONE | i => SOME (i-1)) is, ch, if ch then AbsP (a, Option.map compress_term t, body') else prf) end | shrink ls lev prf = let val (is, ch, _, prf') = shrink' ls lev [] [] prf in (false, is, ch, prf') end and shrink' ls lev ts prfs (prf as prf1 %% prf2) = let val p as (_, is', ch', prf') = shrink ls lev prf2; val (is, ch, ts', prf'') = shrink' ls lev ts (p::prfs) prf1 in (is union is', ch orelse ch', ts', if ch orelse ch' then prf'' %% prf' else prf) end | shrink' ls lev ts prfs (prf as prf1 % t) = let val (is, ch, (ch', t')::ts', prf') = shrink' ls lev (t::ts) prfs prf1 in (is, ch orelse ch', ts', if ch orelse ch' then prf' % Option.map compress_term t' else prf) end | shrink' ls lev ts prfs (prf as PBound i) = (if exists (fn SOME (Bound j) => lev-j <= List.nth (ls, i) | _ => true) ts orelse not (null (duplicates (Library.foldl (fn (js, SOME (Bound j)) => j :: js | (js, _) => js) ([], ts)))) orelse exists #1 prfs then [i] else [], false, map (pair false) ts, prf) | shrink' ls lev ts prfs (Hyp t) = ([], false, map (pair false) ts, Hyp (compress_term t)) | shrink' ls lev ts prfs (prf as MinProof _) = ([], false, map (pair false) ts, prf) | shrink' ls lev ts prfs prf = let val prop = (case prf of PThm (_, _, prop, _) => prop | PAxm (_, prop, _) => prop | Oracle (_, prop, _) => prop | _ => error "shrink: proof not in normal form"); val vs = vars_of prop; val (ts', ts'') = splitAt (length vs, ts) val insts = Library.take (length ts', map (fst o dest_Var) vs) ~~ ts'; val nvs = Library.foldl (fn (ixns', (ixn, ixns)) => insert (op =) ixn (case AList.lookup (op =) insts ixn of SOME (SOME t) => if is_proj t then ixns union ixns' else ixns' | _ => ixns union ixns')) (needed prop ts'' prfs, add_npvars false true [] ([], prop)); val insts' = map (fn (ixn, x as SOME _) => if member (op =) nvs ixn then (false, x) else (true, NONE) | (_, x) => (false, x)) insts in ([], false, insts' @ map (pair false) ts'', prf) end and needed (Const ("==>", _) $ t $ u) ts ((b, _, _, _)::prfs) = (if b then map (fst o dest_Var) (vars_of t) else []) union needed u ts prfs | needed (Var (ixn, _)) (_::_) _ = [ixn] | needed _ _ _ = []; in shrink end; (**** Simple first order matching functions for terms and proofs ****) exception PMatch; (** see pattern.ML **) fun flt (i: int) = List.filter (fn n => n < i); fun fomatch Ts tymatch j = let fun mtch (instsp as (tyinsts, insts)) = fn (Var (ixn, T), t) => if j>0 andalso not (null (flt j (loose_bnos t))) then raise PMatch else (tymatch (tyinsts, fn () => (T, fastype_of1 (Ts, t))), (ixn, t) :: insts) | (Free (a, T), Free (b, U)) => if a=b then (tymatch (tyinsts, K (T, U)), insts) else raise PMatch | (Const (a, T), Const (b, U)) => if a=b then (tymatch (tyinsts, K (T, U)), insts) else raise PMatch | (f $ t, g $ u) => mtch (mtch instsp (f, g)) (t, u) | (Bound i, Bound j) => if i=j then instsp else raise PMatch | _ => raise PMatch in mtch end; fun match_proof Ts tymatch = let fun optmatch _ inst (NONE, _) = inst | optmatch _ _ (SOME _, NONE) = raise PMatch | optmatch mtch inst (SOME x, SOME y) = mtch inst (x, y) fun matcht Ts j (pinst, tinst) (t, u) = (pinst, fomatch Ts tymatch j tinst (t, Envir.beta_norm u)); fun matchT (pinst, (tyinsts, insts)) p = (pinst, (tymatch (tyinsts, K p), insts)); fun matchTs inst (Ts, Us) = Library.foldl (uncurry matchT) (inst, Ts ~~ Us); fun mtch Ts i j (pinst, tinst) (Hyp (Var (ixn, _)), prf) = if i = 0 andalso j = 0 then ((ixn, prf) :: pinst, tinst) else (case apfst (flt i) (apsnd (flt j) (prf_add_loose_bnos 0 0 prf ([], []))) of ([], []) => ((ixn, incr_pboundvars (~i) (~j) prf) :: pinst, tinst) | ([], _) => if j = 0 then ((ixn, incr_pboundvars (~i) (~j) prf) :: pinst, tinst) else raise PMatch | _ => raise PMatch) | mtch Ts i j inst (prf1 % opt1, prf2 % opt2) = optmatch (matcht Ts j) (mtch Ts i j inst (prf1, prf2)) (opt1, opt2) | mtch Ts i j inst (prf1 %% prf2, prf1' %% prf2') = mtch Ts i j (mtch Ts i j inst (prf1, prf1')) (prf2, prf2') | mtch Ts i j inst (Abst (_, opT, prf1), Abst (_, opU, prf2)) = mtch (getOpt (opU,dummyT) :: Ts) i (j+1) (optmatch matchT inst (opT, opU)) (prf1, prf2) | mtch Ts i j inst (prf1, Abst (_, opU, prf2)) = mtch (getOpt (opU,dummyT) :: Ts) i (j+1) inst (incr_pboundvars 0 1 prf1 %> Bound 0, prf2) | mtch Ts i j inst (AbsP (_, opt, prf1), AbsP (_, opu, prf2)) = mtch Ts (i+1) j (optmatch (matcht Ts j) inst (opt, opu)) (prf1, prf2) | mtch Ts i j inst (prf1, AbsP (_, _, prf2)) = mtch Ts (i+1) j inst (incr_pboundvars 1 0 prf1 %% PBound 0, prf2) | mtch Ts i j inst (PThm ((name1, _), _, prop1, opTs), PThm ((name2, _), _, prop2, opUs)) = if name1=name2 andalso prop1=prop2 then optmatch matchTs inst (opTs, opUs) else raise PMatch | mtch Ts i j inst (PAxm (s1, _, opTs), PAxm (s2, _, opUs)) = if s1=s2 then optmatch matchTs inst (opTs, opUs) else raise PMatch | mtch _ _ _ inst (PBound i, PBound j) = if i = j then inst else raise PMatch | mtch _ _ _ _ _ = raise PMatch in mtch Ts 0 0 end; fun prf_subst (pinst, (tyinsts, insts)) = let val substT = Envir.typ_subst_TVars tyinsts; fun subst' lev (t as Var (ixn, _)) = (case AList.lookup (op =) insts ixn of NONE => t | SOME u => incr_boundvars lev u) | subst' lev (Const (s, T)) = Const (s, substT T) | subst' lev (Free (s, T)) = Free (s, substT T) | subst' lev (Abs (a, T, body)) = Abs (a, substT T, subst' (lev+1) body) | subst' lev (f $ t) = subst' lev f $ subst' lev t | subst' _ t = t; fun subst plev tlev (AbsP (a, t, body)) = AbsP (a, Option.map (subst' tlev) t, subst (plev+1) tlev body) | subst plev tlev (Abst (a, T, body)) = Abst (a, Option.map substT T, subst plev (tlev+1) body) | subst plev tlev (prf %% prf') = subst plev tlev prf %% subst plev tlev prf' | subst plev tlev (prf % t) = subst plev tlev prf % Option.map (subst' tlev) t | subst plev tlev (prf as Hyp (Var (ixn, _))) = (case AList.lookup (op =) pinst ixn of NONE => prf | SOME prf' => incr_pboundvars plev tlev prf') | subst _ _ (PThm (id, prf, prop, Ts)) = PThm (id, prf, prop, Option.map (map substT) Ts) | subst _ _ (PAxm (id, prop, Ts)) = PAxm (id, prop, Option.map (map substT) Ts) | subst _ _ t = t in subst 0 0 end; (*A fast unification filter: true unless the two terms cannot be unified. Terms must be NORMAL. Treats all Vars as distinct. *) fun could_unify prf1 prf2 = let fun matchrands (prf1 %% prf2) (prf1' %% prf2') = could_unify prf2 prf2' andalso matchrands prf1 prf1' | matchrands (prf % SOME t) (prf' % SOME t') = Term.could_unify (t, t') andalso matchrands prf prf' | matchrands (prf % _) (prf' % _) = matchrands prf prf' | matchrands _ _ = true fun head_of (prf %% _) = head_of prf | head_of (prf % _) = head_of prf | head_of prf = prf in case (head_of prf1, head_of prf2) of (_, Hyp (Var _)) => true | (Hyp (Var _), _) => true | (PThm ((a, _), _, propa, _), PThm ((b, _), _, propb, _)) => a = b andalso propa = propb andalso matchrands prf1 prf2 | (PAxm (a, _, _), PAxm (b, _, _)) => a = b andalso matchrands prf1 prf2 | (PBound i, PBound j) => i = j andalso matchrands prf1 prf2 | (AbsP _, _) => true (*because of possible eta equality*) | (Abst _, _) => true | (_, AbsP _) => true | (_, Abst _) => true | _ => false end; (**** rewriting on proof terms ****) val skel0 = PBound 0; fun rewrite_prf tymatch (rules, procs) prf = let fun rew _ (Abst (_, _, body) % SOME t) = SOME (prf_subst_bounds [t] body, skel0) | rew _ (AbsP (_, _, body) %% prf) = SOME (prf_subst_pbounds [prf] body, skel0) | rew Ts prf = (case get_first (fn (_, r) => r Ts prf) procs of SOME prf' => SOME (prf', skel0) | NONE => get_first (fn (prf1, prf2) => SOME (prf_subst (match_proof Ts tymatch ([], (Vartab.empty, [])) (prf1, prf)) prf2, prf2) handle PMatch => NONE) (List.filter (could_unify prf o fst) rules)); fun rew0 Ts (prf as AbsP (_, _, prf' %% PBound 0)) = if prf_loose_Pbvar1 prf' 0 then rew Ts prf else let val prf'' = incr_pboundvars (~1) 0 prf' in SOME (getOpt (rew Ts prf'', (prf'', skel0))) end | rew0 Ts (prf as Abst (_, _, prf' % SOME (Bound 0))) = if prf_loose_bvar1 prf' 0 then rew Ts prf else let val prf'' = incr_pboundvars 0 (~1) prf' in SOME (getOpt (rew Ts prf'', (prf'', skel0))) end | rew0 Ts prf = rew Ts prf; fun rew1 _ (Hyp (Var _)) _ = NONE | rew1 Ts skel prf = (case rew2 Ts skel prf of SOME prf1 => (case rew0 Ts prf1 of SOME (prf2, skel') => SOME (getOpt (rew1 Ts skel' prf2, prf2)) | NONE => SOME prf1) | NONE => (case rew0 Ts prf of SOME (prf1, skel') => SOME (getOpt (rew1 Ts skel' prf1, prf1)) | NONE => NONE)) and rew2 Ts skel (prf % SOME t) = (case prf of Abst (_, _, body) => let val prf' = prf_subst_bounds [t] body in SOME (getOpt (rew2 Ts skel0 prf', prf')) end | _ => (case rew1 Ts (case skel of skel' % _ => skel' | _ => skel0) prf of SOME prf' => SOME (prf' % SOME t) | NONE => NONE)) | rew2 Ts skel (prf % NONE) = Option.map (fn prf' => prf' % NONE) (rew1 Ts (case skel of skel' % _ => skel' | _ => skel0) prf) | rew2 Ts skel (prf1 %% prf2) = (case prf1 of AbsP (_, _, body) => let val prf' = prf_subst_pbounds [prf2] body in SOME (getOpt (rew2 Ts skel0 prf', prf')) end | _ => let val (skel1, skel2) = (case skel of skel1 %% skel2 => (skel1, skel2) | _ => (skel0, skel0)) in case rew1 Ts skel1 prf1 of SOME prf1' => (case rew1 Ts skel2 prf2 of SOME prf2' => SOME (prf1' %% prf2') | NONE => SOME (prf1' %% prf2)) | NONE => (case rew1 Ts skel2 prf2 of SOME prf2' => SOME (prf1 %% prf2') | NONE => NONE) end) | rew2 Ts skel (Abst (s, T, prf)) = (case rew1 (getOpt (T,dummyT) :: Ts) (case skel of Abst (_, _, skel') => skel' | _ => skel0) prf of SOME prf' => SOME (Abst (s, T, prf')) | NONE => NONE) | rew2 Ts skel (AbsP (s, t, prf)) = (case rew1 Ts (case skel of AbsP (_, _, skel') => skel' | _ => skel0) prf of SOME prf' => SOME (AbsP (s, t, prf')) | NONE => NONE) | rew2 _ _ _ = NONE in getOpt (rew1 [] skel0 prf, prf) end; fun rewrite_proof thy = rewrite_prf (fn (tyenv, f) => Sign.typ_match thy (f ()) tyenv handle Type.TYPE_MATCH => raise PMatch); fun rewrite_proof_notypes rews = rewrite_prf fst rews; (**** theory data ****) structure ProofData = TheoryDataFun (struct val name = "Pure/proof"; type T = ((proof * proof) list * (string * (typ list -> proof -> proof option)) list); val empty = ([], []); val copy = I; val extend = I; fun merge _ ((rules1, procs1), (rules2, procs2)) = (merge_lists rules1 rules2, merge_alists procs1 procs2); fun print _ _ = (); end); val init_data = ProofData.init; fun add_prf_rrules rs thy = let val r = ProofData.get thy in ProofData.put (rs @ fst r, snd r) thy end; fun add_prf_rprocs ps thy = let val r = ProofData.get thy in ProofData.put (fst r, ps @ snd r) thy end; fun thm_proof thy (name, tags) hyps prop prf = let val prop = Logic.list_implies (hyps, prop); val nvs = needed_vars prop; val args = map (fn (v as Var (ixn, _)) => if member (op =) nvs ixn then SOME v else NONE) (vars_of prop) @ map SOME (sort Term.term_ord (term_frees prop)); val opt_prf = if ! proofs = 2 then #4 (shrink_proof thy [] 0 (rewrite_prf fst (ProofData.get thy) (foldr (uncurry implies_intr_proof) prf hyps))) else MinProof (mk_min_proof prf ([], [], [])); val head = (case strip_combt (fst (strip_combP prf)) of (PThm ((old_name, _), prf', prop', NONE), args') => if (old_name="" orelse old_name=name) andalso prop = prop' andalso args = args' then PThm ((name, tags), prf', prop, NONE) else PThm ((name, tags), opt_prf, prop, NONE) | _ => PThm ((name, tags), opt_prf, prop, NONE)) in proof_combP (proof_combt' (head, args), map Hyp hyps) end; fun get_name_tags hyps prop prf = let val prop = Logic.list_implies (hyps, prop) in (case strip_combt (fst (strip_combP prf)) of (PThm ((name, tags), _, prop', _), _) => if prop=prop' then (name, tags) else ("", []) | (PAxm (name, prop', _), _) => if prop=prop' then (name, []) else ("", []) | _ => ("", [])) end; end; structure BasicProofterm : BASIC_PROOFTERM = Proofterm; open BasicProofterm;