(* Title: ZF/AC/DC.thy ID: $Id: DC.thy,v 1.16 2005/06/17 14:15:10 haftmann Exp $ Author: Krzysztof Grabczewski The proofs concerning the Axiom of Dependent Choice *) theory DC imports AC_Equiv Hartog Cardinal_aux begin lemma RepFun_lepoll: "Ord(a) ==> {P(b). b \ a} \ a" apply (unfold lepoll_def) apply (rule_tac x = "\z \ RepFun (a,P) . LEAST i. z=P (i) " in exI) apply (rule_tac d="%z. P (z)" in lam_injective) apply (fast intro!: Least_in_Ord) apply (rule sym) apply (fast intro: LeastI Ord_in_Ord) done text{*Trivial in the presence of AC, but here we need a wellordering of X*} lemma image_Ord_lepoll: "[| f \ X->Y; Ord(X) |] ==> f``X \ X" apply (unfold lepoll_def) apply (rule_tac x = "\x \ f``X. LEAST y. f`y = x" in exI) apply (rule_tac d = "%z. f`z" in lam_injective) apply (fast intro!: Least_in_Ord apply_equality, clarify) apply (rule LeastI) apply (erule apply_equality, assumption+) apply (blast intro: Ord_in_Ord) done lemma range_subset_domain: "[| R \ X*X; !!g. g \ X ==> \u. \ R |] ==> range(R) \ domain(R)" by blast lemma cons_fun_type: "g \ n->X ==> cons(, g) \ succ(n) -> cons(x, X)" apply (unfold succ_def) apply (fast intro!: fun_extend elim!: mem_irrefl) done lemma cons_fun_type2: "[| g \ n->X; x \ X |] ==> cons(, g) \ succ(n) -> X" by (erule cons_absorb [THEN subst], erule cons_fun_type) lemma cons_image_n: "n \ nat ==> cons(, g)``n = g``n" by (fast elim!: mem_irrefl) lemma cons_val_n: "g \ n->X ==> cons(, g)`n = x" by (fast intro!: apply_equality elim!: cons_fun_type) lemma cons_image_k: "k \ n ==> cons(, g)``k = g``k" by (fast elim: mem_asym) lemma cons_val_k: "[| k \ n; g \ n->X |] ==> cons(, g)`k = g`k" by (fast intro!: apply_equality consI2 elim!: cons_fun_type apply_Pair) lemma domain_cons_eq_succ: "domain(f)=x ==> domain(cons(, f)) = succ(x)" by (simp add: domain_cons succ_def) lemma restrict_cons_eq: "g \ n->X ==> restrict(cons(, g), n) = g" apply (simp add: restrict_def Pi_iff) apply (blast intro: elim: mem_irrefl) done lemma succ_in_succ: "[| Ord(k); i \ k |] ==> succ(i) \ succ(k)" apply (rule Ord_linear [of "succ(i)" "succ(k)", THEN disjE]) apply (fast elim: Ord_in_Ord mem_irrefl mem_asym)+ done lemma restrict_eq_imp_val_eq: "[|restrict(f, domain(g)) = g; x \ domain(g)|] ==> f`x = g`x" by (erule subst, simp add: restrict) lemma domain_eq_imp_fun_type: "[| domain(f)=A; f \ B->C |] ==> f \ A->C" by (frule domain_of_fun, fast) lemma ex_in_domain: "[| R \ A * B; R \ 0 |] ==> \x. x \ domain(R)" by (fast elim!: not_emptyE) constdefs DC :: "i => o" "DC(a) == \X R. R \ Pow(X)*X & (\Y \ Pow(X). Y \ a --> (\x \ X. \ R)) --> (\f \ a->X. \b \ R)" DC0 :: o "DC0 == \A B R. R \ A*B & R\0 & range(R) \ domain(R) --> (\f \ nat->domain(R). \n \ nat. :R)" ff :: "[i, i, i, i] => i" "ff(b, X, Q, R) == transrec(b, %c r. THE x. first(x, {x \ X. \ R}, Q))" locale (open) DC0_imp = fixes XX and RR and X and R assumes all_ex: "\Y \ Pow(X). Y \ nat --> (\x \ X. \ R)" defines XX_def: "XX == (\n \ nat. {f \ n->X. \k \ n. \ R})" and RR_def: "RR == {:XX*XX. domain(z2)=succ(domain(z1)) & restrict(z2, domain(z1)) = z1}" (* ********************************************************************** *) (* DC ==> DC(omega) *) (* *) (* The scheme of the proof: *) (* *) (* Assume DC. Let R and X satisfy the premise of DC(omega). *) (* *) (* Define XX and RR as follows: *) (* *) (* XX = (\n \ nat. {f \ n->X. \k \ n. \ R}) *) (* f RR g iff domain(g)=succ(domain(f)) & *) (* restrict(g, domain(f)) = f *) (* *) (* Then RR satisfies the hypotheses of DC. *) (* So applying DC: *) (* *) (* \f \ nat->XX. \n \ nat. f`n RR f`succ(n) *) (* *) (* Thence *) (* *) (* ff = {. n \ nat} *) (* *) (* is the desired function. *) (* *) (* ********************************************************************** *) lemma (in DC0_imp) lemma1_1: "RR \ XX*XX" by (unfold RR_def, fast) lemma (in DC0_imp) lemma1_2: "RR \ 0" apply (unfold RR_def XX_def) apply (rule all_ex [THEN ballE]) apply (erule_tac [2] notE [OF _ empty_subsetI [THEN PowI]]) apply (erule_tac impE [OF _ nat_0I [THEN n_lesspoll_nat]]) apply (erule bexE) apply (rule_tac a = "<0, {<0, x>}>" in not_emptyI) apply (rule CollectI) apply (rule SigmaI) apply (rule nat_0I [THEN UN_I]) apply (simp (no_asm_simp) add: nat_0I [THEN UN_I]) apply (rule nat_1I [THEN UN_I]) apply (force intro!: singleton_fun [THEN Pi_type] simp add: singleton_0 [symmetric]) apply (simp add: singleton_0) done lemma (in DC0_imp) lemma1_3: "range(RR) \ domain(RR)" apply (unfold RR_def XX_def) apply (rule range_subset_domain, blast, clarify) apply (frule fun_is_rel [THEN image_subset, THEN PowI, THEN all_ex [THEN bspec]]) apply (erule impE[OF _ lesspoll_trans1[OF image_Ord_lepoll [OF _ nat_into_Ord] n_lesspoll_nat]], assumption+) apply (erule bexE) apply (rule_tac x = "cons (, g) " in exI) apply (rule CollectI) apply (force elim!: cons_fun_type2 simp add: cons_image_n cons_val_n cons_image_k cons_val_k) apply (simp add: domain_of_fun succ_def restrict_cons_eq) done lemma (in DC0_imp) lemma2: "[| \n \ nat. \ RR; f \ nat -> XX; n \ nat |] ==> \k \ nat. f`succ(n) \ k -> X & n \ k & \ R" apply (induct_tac "n") apply (drule apply_type [OF _ nat_1I]) apply (drule bspec [OF _ nat_0I]) apply (simp add: XX_def, safe) apply (rule rev_bexI, assumption) apply (subgoal_tac "0 \ y", force) apply (force simp add: RR_def intro: ltD elim!: nat_0_le [THEN leE]) (** LEVEL 7, other subgoal **) apply (drule bspec [OF _ nat_succI], assumption) apply (subgoal_tac "f ` succ (succ (x)) \ succ (k) ->X") apply (drule apply_type [OF _ nat_succI [THEN nat_succI]], assumption) apply (simp (no_asm_use) add: XX_def RR_def) apply safe apply (frule_tac a="succ(k)" in domain_of_fun [symmetric, THEN trans], assumption) apply (frule_tac a=y in domain_of_fun [symmetric, THEN trans], assumption) apply (fast elim!: nat_into_Ord [THEN succ_in_succ] dest!: bspec [OF _ nat_into_Ord [THEN succ_in_succ]]) apply (drule domain_of_fun) apply (simp add: XX_def RR_def, clarify) apply (blast dest: domain_of_fun [symmetric, THEN trans] ) done lemma (in DC0_imp) lemma3_1: "[| \n \ nat. \ RR; f \ nat -> XX; m \ nat |] ==> {f`succ(x)`x. x \ m} = {f`succ(m)`x. x \ m}" apply (subgoal_tac "\x \ m. f`succ (m) `x = f`succ (x) `x") apply simp apply (induct_tac "m", blast) apply (rule ballI) apply (erule succE) apply (rule restrict_eq_imp_val_eq) apply (drule bspec [OF _ nat_succI], assumption) apply (simp add: RR_def) apply (drule lemma2, assumption+) apply (fast dest!: domain_of_fun) apply (drule_tac x = xa in bspec, assumption) apply (erule sym [THEN trans, symmetric]) apply (rule restrict_eq_imp_val_eq [symmetric]) apply (drule bspec [OF _ nat_succI], assumption) apply (simp add: RR_def) apply (drule lemma2, assumption+) apply (blast dest!: domain_of_fun intro: nat_into_Ord OrdmemD [THEN subsetD]) done lemma (in DC0_imp) lemma3: "[| \n \ nat. \ RR; f \ nat -> XX; m \ nat |] ==> (\x \ nat. f`succ(x)`x) `` m = f`succ(m)``m" apply (erule natE, simp) apply (subst image_lam) apply (fast elim!: OrdmemD [OF nat_succI Ord_nat]) apply (subst lemma3_1, assumption+) apply fast apply (fast dest!: lemma2 elim!: image_fun [symmetric, OF _ OrdmemD [OF _ nat_into_Ord]]) done theorem DC0_imp_DC_nat: "DC0 ==> DC(nat)" apply (unfold DC_def DC0_def, clarify) apply (elim allE) apply (erule impE) (*these three results comprise Lemma 1*) apply (blast intro!: DC0_imp.lemma1_1 DC0_imp.lemma1_2 DC0_imp.lemma1_3) apply (erule bexE) apply (rule_tac x = "\n \ nat. f`succ (n) `n" in rev_bexI) apply (rule lam_type, blast dest!: DC0_imp.lemma2 intro: fun_weaken_type) apply (rule oallI) apply (frule DC0_imp.lemma2, assumption) apply (blast intro: fun_weaken_type) apply (erule ltD) (** LEVEL 11: last subgoal **) apply (subst DC0_imp.lemma3, assumption+) apply (fast elim!: fun_weaken_type) apply (erule ltD) apply (force simp add: lt_def) done (* ************************************************************************ DC(omega) ==> DC The scheme of the proof: Assume DC(omega). Let R and x satisfy the premise of DC. Define XX and RR as follows: XX = (\n \ nat. {f \ succ(n)->domain(R). \k \ n. \ R}) RR = {:Fin(XX)*XX. (domain(z2)=succ(\f \ z1. domain(f)) & (\f \ z1. restrict(z2, domain(f)) = f)) | (~ (\g \ XX. domain(g)=succ(\f \ z1. domain(f)) & (\f \ z1. restrict(g, domain(f)) = f)) & z2={<0,x>})} Then XX and RR satisfy the hypotheses of DC(omega). So applying DC: \f \ nat->XX. \n \ nat. f``n RR f`n Thence ff = {. n \ nat} is the desired function. ************************************************************************* *) lemma singleton_in_funs: "x \ X ==> {<0,x>} \ (\n \ nat. {f \ succ(n)->X. \k \ n. \ R})" apply (rule nat_0I [THEN UN_I]) apply (force simp add: singleton_0 [symmetric] intro!: singleton_fun [THEN Pi_type]) done locale (open) imp_DC0 = fixes XX and RR and x and R and f and allRR defines XX_def: "XX == (\n \ nat. {f \ succ(n)->domain(R). \k \ n. \ R})" and RR_def: "RR == {:Fin(XX)*XX. (domain(z2)=succ(\f \ z1. domain(f)) & (\f \ z1. restrict(z2, domain(f)) = f)) | (~ (\g \ XX. domain(g)=succ(\f \ z1. domain(f)) & (\f \ z1. restrict(g, domain(f)) = f)) & z2={<0,x>})}" and allRR_def: "allRR == \b \ {\Fin(XX)*XX. (domain(z2)=succ(\f \ z1. domain(f)) & (\f \ z1. domain(f)) = b & (\f \ z1. restrict(z2,domain(f)) = f))}" lemma (in imp_DC0) lemma4: "[| range(R) \ domain(R); x \ domain(R) |] ==> RR \ Pow(XX)*XX & (\Y \ Pow(XX). Y \ nat --> (\x \ XX. :RR))" apply (rule conjI) apply (force dest!: FinD [THEN PowI] simp add: RR_def) apply (rule impI [THEN ballI]) apply (drule Finite_Fin [OF lesspoll_nat_is_Finite PowD], assumption) apply (case_tac "\g \ XX. domain (g) = succ(\f \ Y. domain(f)) & (\f\Y. restrict(g, domain(f)) = f)") apply (simp add: RR_def, blast) apply (safe del: domainE) apply (unfold XX_def RR_def) apply (rule rev_bexI, erule singleton_in_funs) apply (simp add: nat_0I [THEN rev_bexI] cons_fun_type2) done lemma (in imp_DC0) UN_image_succ_eq: "[| f \ nat->X; n \ nat |] ==> (\x \ f``succ(n). P(x)) = P(f`n) Un (\x \ f``n. P(x))" by (simp add: image_fun OrdmemD) lemma (in imp_DC0) UN_image_succ_eq_succ: "[| (\x \ f``n. P(x)) = y; P(f`n) = succ(y); f \ nat -> X; n \ nat |] ==> (\x \ f``succ(n). P(x)) = succ(y)" by (simp add: UN_image_succ_eq, blast) lemma (in imp_DC0) apply_domain_type: "[| h \ succ(n) -> D; n \ nat; domain(h)=succ(y) |] ==> h`y \ D" by (fast elim: apply_type dest!: trans [OF sym domain_of_fun]) lemma (in imp_DC0) image_fun_succ: "[| h \ nat -> X; n \ nat |] ==> h``succ(n) = cons(h`n, h``n)" by (simp add: image_fun OrdmemD) lemma (in imp_DC0) f_n_type: "[| domain(f`n) = succ(k); f \ nat -> XX; n \ nat |] ==> f`n \ succ(k) -> domain(R)" apply (unfold XX_def) apply (drule apply_type, assumption) apply (fast elim: domain_eq_imp_fun_type) done lemma (in imp_DC0) f_n_pairs_in_R [rule_format]: "[| h \ nat -> XX; domain(h`n) = succ(k); n \ nat |] ==> \i \ k. \ R" apply (unfold XX_def) apply (drule apply_type, assumption) apply (elim UN_E CollectE) apply (drule domain_of_fun [symmetric, THEN trans], assumption, simp) done lemma (in imp_DC0) restrict_cons_eq_restrict: "[| restrict(h, domain(u))=u; h \ n->X; domain(u) \ n |] ==> restrict(cons(, h), domain(u)) = u" apply (unfold restrict_def) apply (simp add: restrict_def Pi_iff) apply (erule sym [THEN trans, symmetric]) apply (blast elim: mem_irrefl) done lemma (in imp_DC0) all_in_image_restrict_eq: "[| \x \ f``n. restrict(f`n, domain(x))=x; f \ nat -> XX; n \ nat; domain(f`n) = succ(n); (\x \ f``n. domain(x)) \ n |] ==> \x \ f``succ(n). restrict(cons(, f`n), domain(x)) = x" apply (rule ballI) apply (simp add: image_fun_succ) apply (drule f_n_type, assumption+) apply (erule disjE) apply (simp add: domain_of_fun restrict_cons_eq) apply (blast intro!: restrict_cons_eq_restrict) done lemma (in imp_DC0) simplify_recursion: "[| \b \ RR; f \ nat -> XX; range(R) \ domain(R); x \ domain(R)|] ==> allRR" apply (unfold RR_def allRR_def) apply (rule oallI, drule ltD) apply (erule nat_induct) apply (drule_tac x=0 in ospec, blast intro: Limit_has_0) apply (force simp add: singleton_fun [THEN domain_of_fun] singleton_in_funs) (*induction step*) (** LEVEL 5 **) (*prevent simplification of ~\ to \~ *) apply (simp only: separation split) apply (drule_tac x="succ(xa)" in ospec, blast intro: ltI) apply (elim conjE disjE) apply (force elim!: trans subst_context intro!: UN_image_succ_eq_succ) apply (erule notE) apply (simp add: XX_def UN_image_succ_eq_succ) apply (elim conjE bexE) apply (drule apply_domain_type, assumption+) apply (erule domainE)+ apply (frule f_n_type) apply (simp add: XX_def, assumption+) apply (rule rev_bexI, erule nat_succI) apply (rename_tac m i j y z) apply (rule_tac x = "cons(, f`m)" in bexI) prefer 2 apply (blast intro: cons_fun_type2) apply (rule conjI) prefer 2 apply (fast del: ballI subsetI elim: trans [OF _ subst_context, THEN domain_cons_eq_succ] subst_context all_in_image_restrict_eq [simplified XX_def] trans equalityD1) (*one remaining subgoal*) apply (rule ballI) apply (erule succE) (** LEVEL 25 **) apply (simp add: cons_val_n cons_val_k) (*assumption+ will not perform the required backtracking!*) apply (drule f_n_pairs_in_R [simplified XX_def, OF _ domain_of_fun], assumption, assumption, assumption) apply (simp add: nat_into_Ord [THEN succ_in_succ] succI2 cons_val_k) done lemma (in imp_DC0) lemma2: "[| allRR; f \ nat->XX; range(R) \ domain(R); x \ domain(R); n \ nat |] ==> f`n \ succ(n) -> domain(R) & (\i \ n. :R)" apply (unfold allRR_def) apply (drule ospec) apply (erule ltI [OF _ Ord_nat]) apply (erule CollectE, simp) apply (rule conjI) prefer 2 apply (fast elim!: f_n_pairs_in_R trans subst_context) apply (unfold XX_def) apply (fast elim!: trans [THEN domain_eq_imp_fun_type] subst_context) done lemma (in imp_DC0) lemma3: "[| allRR; f \ nat->XX; n\nat; range(R) \ domain(R); x \ domain(R) |] ==> f`n`n = f`succ(n)`n" apply (frule lemma2 [THEN conjunct1, THEN domain_of_fun], assumption+) apply (unfold allRR_def) apply (drule ospec) apply (drule ltI [OF nat_succI Ord_nat], assumption, simp) apply (elim conjE ballE) apply (erule restrict_eq_imp_val_eq [symmetric], force) apply (simp add: image_fun OrdmemD) done theorem DC_nat_imp_DC0: "DC(nat) ==> DC0" apply (unfold DC_def DC0_def) apply (intro allI impI) apply (erule asm_rl conjE ex_in_domain [THEN exE] allE)+ apply (erule impE [OF _ imp_DC0.lemma4], assumption+) apply (erule bexE) apply (drule imp_DC0.simplify_recursion, assumption+) apply (rule_tac x = "\n \ nat. f`n`n" in bexI) apply (rule_tac [2] lam_type) apply (erule_tac [2] apply_type [OF imp_DC0.lemma2 [THEN conjunct1] succI1]) apply (rule ballI) apply (frule_tac n="succ(n)" in imp_DC0.lemma2, (assumption|erule nat_succI)+) apply (drule imp_DC0.lemma3, auto) done (* ********************************************************************** *) (* \K. Card(K) --> DC(K) ==> WO3 *) (* ********************************************************************** *) lemma fun_Ord_inj: "[| f \ a->X; Ord(a); !!b c. [| b a |] ==> f`b\f`c |] ==> f \ inj(a, X)" apply (unfold inj_def, simp) apply (intro ballI impI) apply (rule_tac j=x in Ord_in_Ord [THEN Ord_linear_lt], assumption+) apply (blast intro: Ord_in_Ord, auto) apply (atomize, blast dest: not_sym) done lemma value_in_image: "[| f \ X->Y; A \ X; a \ A |] ==> f`a \ f``A" by (fast elim!: image_fun [THEN ssubst]) theorem DC_WO3: "(\K. Card(K) --> DC(K)) ==> WO3" apply (unfold DC_def WO3_def) apply (rule allI) apply (case_tac "A \ Hartog (A)") apply (fast dest!: lesspoll_imp_ex_lt_eqpoll intro!: Ord_Hartog leI [THEN le_imp_subset]) apply (erule allE impE)+ apply (rule Card_Hartog) apply (erule_tac x = A in allE) apply (erule_tac x = "{ \ Pow (A) *A . z1 \ Hartog (A) & z2 \ z1}" in allE) apply simp apply (erule impE, fast elim: lesspoll_lemma [THEN not_emptyE]) apply (erule bexE) apply (rule Hartog_lepoll_selfE) apply (rule lepoll_def [THEN def_imp_iff, THEN iffD2]) apply (rule exI, rule fun_Ord_inj, assumption, rule Ord_Hartog) apply (drule value_in_image) apply (drule OrdmemD, rule Ord_Hartog, assumption+, erule ltD) apply (drule ospec) apply (blast intro: ltI Ord_Hartog, force) done (* ********************************************************************** *) (* WO1 ==> \K. Card(K) --> DC(K) *) (* ********************************************************************** *) lemma images_eq: "[| \x \ A. f`x=g`x; f \ Df->Cf; g \ Dg->Cg; A \ Df; A \ Dg |] ==> f``A = g``A" apply (simp (no_asm_simp) add: image_fun) done lemma lam_images_eq: "[| Ord(a); b \ a |] ==> (\x \ a. h(x))``b = (\x \ b. h(x))``b" apply (rule images_eq) apply (rule ballI) apply (drule OrdmemD [THEN subsetD], assumption+) apply simp apply (fast elim!: RepFunI OrdmemD intro!: lam_type)+ done lemma lam_type_RepFun: "(\b \ a. h(b)) \ a -> {h(b). b \ a}" by (fast intro!: lam_type RepFunI) lemma lemmaX: "[| \Y \ Pow(X). Y \ K --> (\x \ X. \ R); b \ K; Z \ Pow(X); Z \ K |] ==> {x \ X. \ R} \ 0" by blast lemma WO1_DC_lemma: "[| Card(K); well_ord(X,Q); \Y \ Pow(X). Y \ K --> (\x \ X. \ R); b \ K |] ==> ff(b, X, Q, R) \ {x \ X. <(\c \ b. ff(c, X, Q, R))``b, x> \ R}" apply (rule_tac P = "b \ K" in impE, (erule_tac [2] asm_rl)+) apply (rule_tac i=b in Card_is_Ord [THEN Ord_in_Ord, THEN trans_induct], assumption+) apply (rule impI) apply (rule ff_def [THEN def_transrec, THEN ssubst]) apply (erule the_first_in, fast) apply (simp add: image_fun [OF lam_type_RepFun subset_refl]) apply (erule lemmaX, assumption) apply (blast intro: Card_is_Ord OrdmemD [THEN subsetD]) apply (blast intro: lesspoll_trans1 in_Card_imp_lesspoll RepFun_lepoll) done theorem WO1_DC_Card: "WO1 ==> \K. Card(K) --> DC(K)" apply (unfold DC_def WO1_def) apply (rule allI impI)+ apply (erule allE exE conjE)+ apply (rule_tac x = "\b \ K. ff (b, X, Ra, R) " in bexI) apply (simp add: lam_images_eq [OF Card_is_Ord ltD]) apply (fast elim!: ltE WO1_DC_lemma [THEN CollectD2]) apply (rule_tac lam_type) apply (rule WO1_DC_lemma [THEN CollectD1], assumption+) done end