(* Title: ZF/Trancl.thy ID: $Id: Trancl.thy,v 1.20 2005/06/17 14:15:09 haftmann Exp $ Author: Lawrence C Paulson, Cambridge University Computer Laboratory Copyright 1992 University of Cambridge *) header{*Relations: Their General Properties and Transitive Closure*} theory Trancl imports Fixedpt Perm begin constdefs refl :: "[i,i]=>o" "refl(A,r) == (ALL x: A. : r)" irrefl :: "[i,i]=>o" "irrefl(A,r) == ALL x: A. ~: r" sym :: "i=>o" "sym(r) == ALL x y. : r --> : r" asym :: "i=>o" "asym(r) == ALL x y. :r --> ~ :r" antisym :: "i=>o" "antisym(r) == ALL x y.:r --> :r --> x=y" trans :: "i=>o" "trans(r) == ALL x y z. : r --> : r --> : r" trans_on :: "[i,i]=>o" ("trans[_]'(_')") "trans[A](r) == ALL x:A. ALL y:A. ALL z:A. : r --> : r --> : r" rtrancl :: "i=>i" ("(_^*)" [100] 100) (*refl/transitive closure*) "r^* == lfp(field(r)*field(r), %s. id(field(r)) Un (r O s))" trancl :: "i=>i" ("(_^+)" [100] 100) (*transitive closure*) "r^+ == r O r^*" equiv :: "[i,i]=>o" "equiv(A,r) == r <= A*A & refl(A,r) & sym(r) & trans(r)" subsection{*General properties of relations*} subsubsection{*irreflexivity*} lemma irreflI: "[| !!x. x:A ==> ~: r |] ==> irrefl(A,r)" by (simp add: irrefl_def) lemma irreflE: "[| irrefl(A,r); x:A |] ==> ~: r" by (simp add: irrefl_def) subsubsection{*symmetry*} lemma symI: "[| !!x y.: r ==> : r |] ==> sym(r)" by (unfold sym_def, blast) lemma symE: "[| sym(r); : r |] ==> : r" by (unfold sym_def, blast) subsubsection{*antisymmetry*} lemma antisymI: "[| !!x y.[| : r; : r |] ==> x=y |] ==> antisym(r)" by (simp add: antisym_def, blast) lemma antisymE: "[| antisym(r); : r; : r |] ==> x=y" by (simp add: antisym_def, blast) subsubsection{*transitivity*} lemma transD: "[| trans(r); :r; :r |] ==> :r" by (unfold trans_def, blast) lemma trans_onD: "[| trans[A](r); :r; :r; a:A; b:A; c:A |] ==> :r" by (unfold trans_on_def, blast) lemma trans_imp_trans_on: "trans(r) ==> trans[A](r)" by (unfold trans_def trans_on_def, blast) lemma trans_on_imp_trans: "[|trans[A](r); r <= A*A|] ==> trans(r)"; by (simp add: trans_on_def trans_def, blast) subsection{*Transitive closure of a relation*} lemma rtrancl_bnd_mono: "bnd_mono(field(r)*field(r), %s. id(field(r)) Un (r O s))" by (rule bnd_monoI, blast+) lemma rtrancl_mono: "r<=s ==> r^* <= s^*" apply (unfold rtrancl_def) apply (rule lfp_mono) apply (rule rtrancl_bnd_mono)+ apply blast done (* r^* = id(field(r)) Un ( r O r^* ) *) lemmas rtrancl_unfold = rtrancl_bnd_mono [THEN rtrancl_def [THEN def_lfp_unfold], standard] (** The relation rtrancl **) (* r^* <= field(r) * field(r) *) lemmas rtrancl_type = rtrancl_def [THEN def_lfp_subset, standard] lemma relation_rtrancl: "relation(r^*)" apply (simp add: relation_def) apply (blast dest: rtrancl_type [THEN subsetD]) done (*Reflexivity of rtrancl*) lemma rtrancl_refl: "[| a: field(r) |] ==> : r^*" apply (rule rtrancl_unfold [THEN ssubst]) apply (erule idI [THEN UnI1]) done (*Closure under composition with r *) lemma rtrancl_into_rtrancl: "[| : r^*; : r |] ==> : r^*" apply (rule rtrancl_unfold [THEN ssubst]) apply (rule compI [THEN UnI2], assumption, assumption) done (*rtrancl of r contains all pairs in r *) lemma r_into_rtrancl: " : r ==> : r^*" by (rule rtrancl_refl [THEN rtrancl_into_rtrancl], blast+) (*The premise ensures that r consists entirely of pairs*) lemma r_subset_rtrancl: "relation(r) ==> r <= r^*" by (simp add: relation_def, blast intro: r_into_rtrancl) lemma rtrancl_field: "field(r^*) = field(r)" by (blast intro: r_into_rtrancl dest!: rtrancl_type [THEN subsetD]) (** standard induction rule **) lemma rtrancl_full_induct [case_names initial step, consumes 1]: "[| : r^*; !!x. x: field(r) ==> P(); !!x y z.[| P(); : r^*; : r |] ==> P() |] ==> P()" by (erule def_induct [OF rtrancl_def rtrancl_bnd_mono], blast) (*nice induction rule. Tried adding the typing hypotheses y,z:field(r), but these caused expensive case splits!*) lemma rtrancl_induct [case_names initial step, induct set: rtrancl]: "[| : r^*; P(a); !!y z.[| : r^*; : r; P(y) |] ==> P(z) |] ==> P(b)" (*by induction on this formula*) apply (subgoal_tac "ALL y. = --> P (y) ") (*now solve first subgoal: this formula is sufficient*) apply (erule spec [THEN mp], rule refl) (*now do the induction*) apply (erule rtrancl_full_induct, blast+) done (*transitivity of transitive closure!! -- by induction.*) lemma trans_rtrancl: "trans(r^*)" apply (unfold trans_def) apply (intro allI impI) apply (erule_tac b = z in rtrancl_induct, assumption) apply (blast intro: rtrancl_into_rtrancl) done lemmas rtrancl_trans = trans_rtrancl [THEN transD, standard] (*elimination of rtrancl -- by induction on a special formula*) lemma rtranclE: "[| : r^*; (a=b) ==> P; !!y.[| : r^*; : r |] ==> P |] ==> P" apply (subgoal_tac "a = b | (EX y. : r^* & : r) ") (*see HOL/trancl*) apply blast apply (erule rtrancl_induct, blast+) done (**** The relation trancl ****) (*Transitivity of r^+ is proved by transitivity of r^* *) lemma trans_trancl: "trans(r^+)" apply (unfold trans_def trancl_def) apply (blast intro: rtrancl_into_rtrancl trans_rtrancl [THEN transD, THEN compI]) done lemmas trans_on_trancl = trans_trancl [THEN trans_imp_trans_on] lemmas trancl_trans = trans_trancl [THEN transD, standard] (** Conversions between trancl and rtrancl **) lemma trancl_into_rtrancl: " : r^+ ==> : r^*" apply (unfold trancl_def) apply (blast intro: rtrancl_into_rtrancl) done (*r^+ contains all pairs in r *) lemma r_into_trancl: " : r ==> : r^+" apply (unfold trancl_def) apply (blast intro!: rtrancl_refl) done (*The premise ensures that r consists entirely of pairs*) lemma r_subset_trancl: "relation(r) ==> r <= r^+" by (simp add: relation_def, blast intro: r_into_trancl) (*intro rule by definition: from r^* and r *) lemma rtrancl_into_trancl1: "[| : r^*; : r |] ==> : r^+" by (unfold trancl_def, blast) (*intro rule from r and r^* *) lemma rtrancl_into_trancl2: "[| : r; : r^* |] ==> : r^+" apply (erule rtrancl_induct) apply (erule r_into_trancl) apply (blast intro: r_into_trancl trancl_trans) done (*Nice induction rule for trancl*) lemma trancl_induct [case_names initial step, induct set: trancl]: "[| : r^+; !!y. [| : r |] ==> P(y); !!y z.[| : r^+; : r; P(y) |] ==> P(z) |] ==> P(b)" apply (rule compEpair) apply (unfold trancl_def, assumption) (*by induction on this formula*) apply (subgoal_tac "ALL z. : r --> P (z) ") (*now solve first subgoal: this formula is sufficient*) apply blast apply (erule rtrancl_induct) apply (blast intro: rtrancl_into_trancl1)+ done (*elimination of r^+ -- NOT an induction rule*) lemma tranclE: "[| : r^+; : r ==> P; !!y.[| : r^+; : r |] ==> P |] ==> P" apply (subgoal_tac " : r | (EX y. : r^+ & : r) ") apply blast apply (rule compEpair) apply (unfold trancl_def, assumption) apply (erule rtranclE) apply (blast intro: rtrancl_into_trancl1)+ done lemma trancl_type: "r^+ <= field(r)*field(r)" apply (unfold trancl_def) apply (blast elim: rtrancl_type [THEN subsetD, THEN SigmaE2]) done lemma relation_trancl: "relation(r^+)" apply (simp add: relation_def) apply (blast dest: trancl_type [THEN subsetD]) done lemma trancl_subset_times: "r \ A * A ==> r^+ \ A * A" by (insert trancl_type [of r], blast) lemma trancl_mono: "r<=s ==> r^+ <= s^+" by (unfold trancl_def, intro comp_mono rtrancl_mono) lemma trancl_eq_r: "[|relation(r); trans(r)|] ==> r^+ = r" apply (rule equalityI) prefer 2 apply (erule r_subset_trancl, clarify) apply (frule trancl_type [THEN subsetD], clarify) apply (erule trancl_induct, assumption) apply (blast dest: transD) done (** Suggested by Sidi Ould Ehmety **) lemma rtrancl_idemp [simp]: "(r^*)^* = r^*" apply (rule equalityI, auto) prefer 2 apply (frule rtrancl_type [THEN subsetD]) apply (blast intro: r_into_rtrancl ) txt{*converse direction*} apply (frule rtrancl_type [THEN subsetD], clarify) apply (erule rtrancl_induct) apply (simp add: rtrancl_refl rtrancl_field) apply (blast intro: rtrancl_trans) done lemma rtrancl_subset: "[| R <= S; S <= R^* |] ==> S^* = R^*" apply (drule rtrancl_mono) apply (drule rtrancl_mono, simp_all, blast) done lemma rtrancl_Un_rtrancl: "[| relation(r); relation(s) |] ==> (r^* Un s^*)^* = (r Un s)^*" apply (rule rtrancl_subset) apply (blast dest: r_subset_rtrancl) apply (blast intro: rtrancl_mono [THEN subsetD]) done (*** "converse" laws by Sidi Ould Ehmety ***) (** rtrancl **) lemma rtrancl_converseD: ":converse(r)^* ==> :converse(r^*)" apply (rule converseI) apply (frule rtrancl_type [THEN subsetD]) apply (erule rtrancl_induct) apply (blast intro: rtrancl_refl) apply (blast intro: r_into_rtrancl rtrancl_trans) done lemma rtrancl_converseI: ":converse(r^*) ==> :converse(r)^*" apply (drule converseD) apply (frule rtrancl_type [THEN subsetD]) apply (erule rtrancl_induct) apply (blast intro: rtrancl_refl) apply (blast intro: r_into_rtrancl rtrancl_trans) done lemma rtrancl_converse: "converse(r)^* = converse(r^*)" apply (safe intro!: equalityI) apply (frule rtrancl_type [THEN subsetD]) apply (safe dest!: rtrancl_converseD intro!: rtrancl_converseI) done (** trancl **) lemma trancl_converseD: ":converse(r)^+ ==> :converse(r^+)" apply (erule trancl_induct) apply (auto intro: r_into_trancl trancl_trans) done lemma trancl_converseI: ":converse(r^+) ==> :converse(r)^+" apply (drule converseD) apply (erule trancl_induct) apply (auto intro: r_into_trancl trancl_trans) done lemma trancl_converse: "converse(r)^+ = converse(r^+)" apply (safe intro!: equalityI) apply (frule trancl_type [THEN subsetD]) apply (safe dest!: trancl_converseD intro!: trancl_converseI) done lemma converse_trancl_induct [case_names initial step, consumes 1]: "[| :r^+; !!y. :r ==> P(y); !!y z. [| : r; : r^+; P(z) |] ==> P(y) |] ==> P(a)" apply (drule converseI) apply (simp (no_asm_use) add: trancl_converse [symmetric]) apply (erule trancl_induct) apply (auto simp add: trancl_converse) done ML {* val refl_def = thm "refl_def"; val irrefl_def = thm "irrefl_def"; val equiv_def = thm "equiv_def"; val sym_def = thm "sym_def"; val asym_def = thm "asym_def"; val antisym_def = thm "antisym_def"; val trans_def = thm "trans_def"; val trans_on_def = thm "trans_on_def"; val irreflI = thm "irreflI"; val symI = thm "symI"; val symI = thm "symI"; val antisymI = thm "antisymI"; val antisymE = thm "antisymE"; val transD = thm "transD"; val trans_onD = thm "trans_onD"; val rtrancl_bnd_mono = thm "rtrancl_bnd_mono"; val rtrancl_mono = thm "rtrancl_mono"; val rtrancl_unfold = thm "rtrancl_unfold"; val rtrancl_type = thm "rtrancl_type"; val rtrancl_refl = thm "rtrancl_refl"; val rtrancl_into_rtrancl = thm "rtrancl_into_rtrancl"; val r_into_rtrancl = thm "r_into_rtrancl"; val r_subset_rtrancl = thm "r_subset_rtrancl"; val rtrancl_field = thm "rtrancl_field"; val rtrancl_full_induct = thm "rtrancl_full_induct"; val rtrancl_induct = thm "rtrancl_induct"; val trans_rtrancl = thm "trans_rtrancl"; val rtrancl_trans = thm "rtrancl_trans"; val rtranclE = thm "rtranclE"; val trans_trancl = thm "trans_trancl"; val trancl_trans = thm "trancl_trans"; val trancl_into_rtrancl = thm "trancl_into_rtrancl"; val r_into_trancl = thm "r_into_trancl"; val r_subset_trancl = thm "r_subset_trancl"; val rtrancl_into_trancl1 = thm "rtrancl_into_trancl1"; val rtrancl_into_trancl2 = thm "rtrancl_into_trancl2"; val trancl_induct = thm "trancl_induct"; val tranclE = thm "tranclE"; val trancl_type = thm "trancl_type"; val trancl_mono = thm "trancl_mono"; val rtrancl_idemp = thm "rtrancl_idemp"; val rtrancl_subset = thm "rtrancl_subset"; val rtrancl_converseD = thm "rtrancl_converseD"; val rtrancl_converseI = thm "rtrancl_converseI"; val rtrancl_converse = thm "rtrancl_converse"; val trancl_converseD = thm "trancl_converseD"; val trancl_converseI = thm "trancl_converseI"; val trancl_converse = thm "trancl_converse"; val converse_trancl_induct = thm "converse_trancl_induct"; *} end